27°F
sponsored by:
FIND IT WITH OUR NEW DIRECTORY!
Click to activate search window!
Local    Subscribe to our feeds    Add to My Yahoo!
Advertisement

Advertising Info

Article Options

Comments (9 comment(s))  |  Email this story
Print this story  |  Discuss  |  Big Text  |  Normal Text
Current Rating:
0
   Number of Votes:
0
Rate:  |  |  | 
Save and Share  add to yahoo add delicious add to digg add to facebook add to reddit add to newsvine  
   How do I share?
Clock ticking on assessor referendum
By Blackwell Thomas, The Southern
Thursday, July 24, 2008 10:43 PM CDT
CARBONDALE - The inclusion of a referendum on whether the county tax assessor should be elected or appointed is far from a sure thing on this November's ballot.

According to the measure's prime sponsor, County Board Member Dan Bost, it's about 1,200 signatures away.

Supporters have until Aug. 18 to submit 4,200 signatures, or one-tenth of the county's electorate, to ensure the referendum is attached. The only other way the referendum can be included is through a vote by the county board.

Bost said Thursday he's optimistic that voters will see the referendum included on their ballots.

"We are moving right a long," he said of the signature drive. "And if we don't make it this time, there is enough of a consensus and awareness is growing. It's going to be on the ballot eventually."

Bost added, "I think there is a chance that the board could vote yes on this."

But the board hasn't done that yet. And, at an early June committee meeting, the group tasked with reviewing the referendum made no recommendations.

At an earlier committee meeting on the matter, board members asked political scientist John Jackson of Southern Illinois University Carbondale to weigh in on the matter.

Jackson said he recommended against the election of an assessor.

"There are problems with the concept," he said. "You've got a lot of executive officers already, and this adds on more to it. The public administration literature suggests it's better to appoint and hold the people who do the appointing accountable at the ballot box."

The assessor's post is a highly specialized one that requires a more thorough consideration of credentials than most voters care to undertake, said Jackson.

"It's a very technical position that requires expertise gained by study," he said. "Those people can be found more easily by officials. The public generally doesn't take the time to look at the candidates' qualifications that thoroughly."

Murphysboro resident Russ Wright said there is no question in his mind that the voters should decide the appoint-elect question

"There is some possibility that the voters, by voting no, will come back and say, 'We don't want this decision (and) we prefer to have the county board continue to make that decision,'" he said. "But we do think that the voters should at least be consulted. and that's what this is basically about."

blackwell.thomas@thesouthern.com

351-5823


Add Your Own Comments

No account? Register here!

If you already have, sign in below:
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

 

truth wrote on Jul 25, 2008 3:59 PM:

" If this becomes an elected position, what will stop Bubba (that has no idea what is going on)from running for the job. Yes Dan Bost is at the head of this but he would not be doing it without big brother Mike's ok. Next we will be hearing from Ms. Pitman on how this is real important to the people. What is the current Assoser doing so bad that we need to change the whole system, I have not heard that yet? "

beenatmtgs wrote on Jul 25, 2008 2:37 PM:

" Mr. Bost had a handout at a meeting with the name of the only other person that is qualified in the county to run or be appointed for this position. This person sent Mr. Bost information. Why is that? Also, if the petition has failed more than twice, maybe three times, doesn't that pretty much say most of Jackson County residents feel it should not change. To "truth": the other qualified person for this position in Jackson County is not one of MIKE BOST'S "cronies" this person is a democrat. Remember, this is DAN Bost pushing this. Not MIKE Bost. "

beenatmtgs wrote on Jul 25, 2008 2:30 PM:

" Why was the name of the only other qualified person on the handout Mr. Bost had at a meeting? This person sent Mr. Bost information. To "truth" the other qualified person is not a MIKE BOST "cronie". This person is a democrat. Remeber this is DAN Bost doing this NOT MIKE Bost. "

Southern Illinoisan wrote on Jul 25, 2008 1:52 PM:

" A person must already be qualified to be appointed by the County Board for this position, or be qualified before you can run. The Illinois Department of Revenue sends out a list of those persons that have the qualifications. According to what was said in the meeting Mr. Jackson was in attendance at, there are only two people in all of Jackson county that are qualified. "

get a clue wrote on Jul 25, 2008 11:38 AM:

" I for one believe that the people should have their say by a vote. To many times a board could appoint someone and have control over them. This should be ran like any other office in Jackson County. Put it up for a vote and let the people have their say, maybe they prefer someone else.
What would it hurt? "

truth wrote on Jul 25, 2008 11:08 AM:

" That’s all the County needs is another Bost crony from M'boro being elected, but that’s about to change! This would not be an issue but certain Rep Mike Bost supports are being effected by the current Assessors rulings on property use and they are crying to old Mike Bost, thus we NOW have a problem! I don't believe we need local bubba or bubbette trying to decipher State law and regulations with no credentials. Maybe Dan Bost could start WORKING with the other board members and set up hiring criteria for the position as well as a protocol to solve differences between the Board and Assessor rulings! God forbid we have an independent nonbiased third party involved in Murphysboro politics! "

rjgma wrote on Jul 25, 2008 10:52 AM:

" What would this cost the taxpayers to have this put on the ballot? Is there a difference in the pay scale between an elected official and an appointed position. If the salary/retirement or anything else is more for the elected official, how much will this cost the taxpayers? What is the real benefit of elected over appointed. From what Mr. Jackson says, appointed is better. What is Mr. Bost's real motive for this? Isn't this either the third or fourth time he has tried to get the petition together? "

ron50 wrote on Jul 25, 2008 10:41 AM:

" I think we should elect the dog catcher too. "

Southern Illinoisan wrote on Jul 25, 2008 9:20 AM:

" I agree with Mr. Jackson. The general public does not know what this position entails. It's not a problem of having the people vote, it's a problem of voting without being educated and fully informed. "