30°F
sponsored by:
FIND IT WITH OUR NEW DIRECTORY!
Click to activate search window!
Top    Subscribe to our feeds    Add to My Yahoo!
story breakdown
New law requires first-time offenders to install alcohol monitoring devices in vehicles
Advertisement

Advertising Info

Article Options

Comments (9 comment(s))  |  Email this story
Print this story  |  Discuss  |  Big Text  |  Normal Text
Current Rating:
0
   Number of Votes:
0
Rate:  |  |  | 
Save and Share  add to yahoo add delicious add to digg add to facebook add to reddit add to newsvine  
   How do I share?
Drunk drivers forced to pass the breath test
By Bethany Krajelis, The Southern
Sunday, September 2, 2007 12:50 AM CDT
FOR THE RECORD

DUI arrests in 2005 for the southern 15 counties of Illinois, according to the Illinois Secretary of State's 2007 DUI Fact Book:

l Jackson: 470

l Williamson: 386

l Jefferson: 187

l Randolph: 149

l Franklin: 136

l Massac: 103

l Union: 92

l Perry: 67

l Johnson: 66

l Alexander: 58

l Gallatin: 57

l Pulaski: 47

l Hamilton: 21

l Hardin: 23

l Pope: 19

SPRINGFIELD - First-time drunk-driving offenders will be able to keep driving as long as they can prove to a machine that they are sober enough to drive, under legislation the governor passed last week.

The law, which was an initiative of Mothers Against Drunk Driving, will make Illinois one of four states that require first-time offenders to install a breath-alcohol monitoring device in their vehicle. The device, which is linked to the vehicle's ignition, requires drivers to pass an alcohol breath test before the ignition will turn over.

Derek DePoister, a 21-year-old Southern Illinois University Carbondale student, said he thinks the law is a good idea but that it might be too strict.

"The idea of keeping drunks off the road is great," he said. "It just seems to be a little much. I guess it's kind of a double-edged sword."

Jackson County State's Attorney Mike Wepsiec said the legislation, which was sponsored by Sen. John J. Cullerton, D-Chicago, is not a bad idea. He said he still has questions regarding enforcement but said it will affect offenders beyond his office.

Jackson County reported the most arrests for driving under the influence of alcohol out of the state's southern 15 counties in 2005. According to the Secretary of State's 2007 DUI Fact Book, Jackson County had 470 DUI arrests in 2005, with Williamson County coming in second with 386.

Maurice McCann, a Murphysboro attorney who represents DUI defendants among others, said the large number of SIUC students residing in Jackson County might contribute to the large number of arrests. The stricter law, McCann said, might make tipsy drivers think twice.

"It's pretty expensive," McCann said. "From a monetary standpoint, it may make younger people ask, 'What is it going to cost you?'"

Dave Drucker, secretary of state spokesman, said the device will cost an offender about $150 for installation and about $70 month to rent the device. He added that there are six companies in Illinois that sell the breath alcohol monitoring device, also known as BAIID.

The new law, which starts in January 2009, will probably result in an increase in the number of motorists with the device, Drucker said. Currently, there are about 3,000 people, mostly repeat DUI offenders, with the device. He's expecting that number to jump to about 30,000 after the law kicks in.

Antonio Cannon, an SIUC paralegal major from Chicago, said he supports the law.

"I don't drink, and people abuse liquor. It's getting out of hand," he said. "I think the stricter law will make an example out of people, and that's the only way people will learn."

The new law also abolishes judicial driving permits, which allow offenders to drive to work or school.

During this spring's legislative session, several state lawmakers applauded killing the permits because some people, like stay-at-home parents, are not eligible.

While people like DePoister argue that the law is too strict, Drucker said the device is not mandatory. Offenders can chose not to install the device, but then they wouldn't be able to drive.

The law also doubles license suspensions for first-time offenders. Under current law, a DUI offender's license is suspended for three months, or six months if the offender refuses a breath test.

Some might wonder whether a sober friend could simply blow into the device to start the offender's vehicle. The device, however, requires drivers to pass breath tests at random intervals, in which drivers are instructed to pull off the road to take the test.

McCann said some of his clients who have had the device have had problems with the device registering properly in cold weather.

"Any type of machine can make errors," McCann said. "But I think the benefits far outweigh an occasional error."

bethany.krajelis@thesouthern.com / 351-5816


Add Your Own Comments

No account? Register here!

If you already have, sign in below:
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

 

Bill D wrote on Sep 5, 2007 5:58 AM:

" Meleah, too strong for first timers????.Nah!, Maybe if we had this years back my Wife, Son and Daughter would be here, not buried in the cemetary!. "

Simply stated wrote on Sep 3, 2007 10:28 AM:

" This legislation sounds good. Now, what about the more difficult issues we face? "

dennis west wrote on Sep 2, 2007 11:15 PM:

" you no this sounds great but how many people well get drunk and just have a buddy blow into and start the car for them to drive off???? they shoudl lose thier car and go to jail its not worth trying to give them a second chance what if the second chance kills them or someone else? then what we gonna do? not a good thing "

oh no not again wrote on Sep 2, 2007 4:57 PM:

" hay drunks u know how to get around this dont u have your kid wife or passere by blow into it and then u candrive ndrunk alot of good those things will do wake up people even a old woman like me can figure that out "

Saline reader wrote on Sep 2, 2007 3:50 PM:

" I guess Saline county must not have enough subscribers to The Southern to list their DUI stats. According to the Fact Sheet at: http://tinyurl.com/2v7yne Saline had 171 in 2005. "

Disgusted wrote on Sep 2, 2007 1:36 PM:

" Don't get me wrong, I am against drunk driving. I think this law is more of a windfall for the companies providing the breathalyzer devices than it is a deterrent to drunk driving. "

Meleah wrote on Sep 2, 2007 9:50 AM:

" I think that the law is too strict for first time offenders. The machine is also dangerous due to it having to be blown in to while you drive. It will cause wrecks that could be avoided. "

Mr. Geography wrote on Sep 2, 2007 8:39 AM:

" Why isn't Saline County on the list. It's one of the 15 southernmost counties? I am surprised your editor didn't catch this? "

Steve S. wrote on Sep 2, 2007 8:23 AM:

" Still one major flaw. Unless the car is confiscated, people will ignore the new law an drive anyway just as they do now. Check the court report in the Southern on any given Sunday. How many driving on suspended or revoked licenses do you see? They usually out number the DUI arrests. "