72°F
sponsored by:
FIND IT WITH OUR NEW DIRECTORY!
Click to activate search window!
Top    Subscribe to our feeds    Add to My Yahoo!
Advertisement

Advertising Info

Article Options

Comments (18 comment(s))  |  Email this story
Print this story  |  Discuss  |  Big Text  |  Normal Text
Current Rating:
0
   Number of Votes:
0
Rate:  |  |  | 
Save and Share  add to yahoo add delicious add to digg add to facebook add to reddit add to newsvine  
   How do I share?
Plagiarism watchdogs say they only want fair play
BY CALEB HALE, THE SOUTHERN
Sunday, September 17, 2006 8:48 AM CDT

CARBONDALE - Despite publicizing the alleged plagiarism that's put "Southern at 150" in question, Alumni and Faculty Against Corruption at Southern Illinois University contends it will stand behind Chancellor Walter Wendler if he is punished while the nearly 100 other alleged instances of plagiarism the group has found go unchecked.



"We simply want all SIU employees to be treated fairly, equally and consistently in accordance with the university's policies," read a message from AFACSIU leader Tyson Giger Monday.



Giger, an SIU-Edwardsville alumnus who started the group with others to support the court case of a former professor fired for plagiarizing in 2004, stated he has knowledge of nearly 100 pieces of allegedly plagiarized work split almost evenly between faculty and administrators in the university system.



Such instances, Giger said, "are clear with respect to SIU material being taken from other sources." He added when someone in AFACSIU suspects they've found something, the document is reviewed by several people for confirmation.



AFACSIU members last week handed over evidence to the Chronicle of Higher Education they say shows Southern at 150 ? the Carbondale campus' long-term plan to become a top 75 research university ? comes largely from a similar plan Wendler implemented as an administrator at Texas A&M University at College Station in the late 1990s.



Giger said the group in the past tried to quietly bring their concerns to university officials, but ?"when members of AFACSIU have tried to show some of their findings to the SIU administration, nothing was done. Things were only addressed after we sent the material to the press."



Giger cited an incident last year in which they told SIUE's student newspaper about a dean that had plagiarized his welcome message, after the administration failed to act. Only then, he said, the dean's message change.



"SIU is our investment. It is on our resumes. SIU needs to take these issues of academic integrity seriously and not on an ad hoc basis," Giger said in his message.



President Glenn Poshard declined to comment when asked about the tactics AFACSIU is employing. He had previously said he wouldn't comment until a panel he appointed to review the Southern at 150 allegations completes its investigation.



Carbondale linguistics professor Joan Friedenberg, who last week went to Poshard seeking amnesty for anyone who had plagiarized ? including the SIUE professor Chris Dussold, issued a statement over the weekend, which said she had warned the president AFACSIU might take dozens of alleged plagiarism instances public.



"Treating each on a case-by-case basis will result in a protracted public relations disaster for SIU, while destroying the careers of many good people who made mistakes," Friedenberg's statement read. "I still believe that showing compassion by means of a general amnesty would have been the most reasonable approach, an approach exhibiting fairness, ethics and integrity. That approach would have shown Poshard and SIU to be leaders in addressing a problem that continues to damage universities and careers throughout the country."



Wendler authored both the SIUC and Texas A&M plans



 



Chancellor Wendler continued to decline to comment Monday on the allegations Southern at 150 plagiarizes Texas A&M's "Vision 2020," but officials on the Texas campus said Wendler's chief assignment as executive assistant to the university president at the time was to create a long-range plan. He worked on the initiative after a 1997 proposal by then-President Ray Bowen to make Texas A&M one of the top 10 public universities in the nation by the year 2020.



Lane Stephenson, a spokesman for Texas A&M, wouldn't go into specific details surrounding the allegations against Wendler.



"It's something we don't have any direct comment on, but certainly we confirm he was the coordinator," Stephenson said.



The influence Vision 2020 had on the formation of Southern at 150 is apparent when comparing the final reports. Both plans hold goals for their respective universities to attain a certain rank by a certain date (top 10 by 2020 in Texas A&M's case and top 75 by 2019 for SIUC). Both plans set up peer institutions for the university to measure itself by. Both plans also have similar emphases on teaching, strengthening graduate programs, enhanced undergraduate experiences and increasing the university's knowledge resources.



Timothy Dodd, the executive director of Duke University's Center for Academic Integrity, said since all universities can be assumed to want to provide the best services for students there will be overlapping themes in strategies.



"Sometimes there are just exemplary documents out there that institutions would be flattered to know were adopted to serve a purpose at another institution," Dodd said. "I think what was unusual here is the fact elements were copied verbatim from one plan or without the creativity of rewriting and making it clearly pertinent to SIU the elements of that strategic plan."



Dodd said despite the fact Wendler conceived both plans, he may have avoided this problem had he made it more clear where the ideas for Southern at 150 originated from.



"I see this as poor practice and in need of some more overt disclosure in the source material for some of the text, but I don't see it as holding the same weight as claiming personal authorship over plagiarized material," Dodd said. "It's not for anyone's head to roll, but it's a reminder of the basic courtesy and graciousness that should operate in higher education circles. We should be acknowledging where we find prior documentations and prior writings that are helpful to our current effort."



The SIUC three-person panel President Poshard appointed to review allegations against Wendler will have the responsibilities of (1) reviewing both Southern at 150 and Vision 2020, (2) providing a forum for responses from both Wendler and AFACSIU, (3) to review current board of trustees policy on plagiarism and (4) submitting a written report to Poshard about its findings. The panel will make no decision regarding employment action against or for Wendler.



Panel members are Paul Simon Public Policy Director Mike Lawrence, SIUC zoology department chair William Muhlach and SIU law school associate dean Wenona Whitfield.



 



caleb.hale@thesouthern.com



(618) 529-5454 ext. 5090



 



Add Your Own Comments

No account? Register here!

Terms & Conditions

If you already have, sign in below:
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

 

Telling it Like It Is wrote on Sep 16, 2006 2:36 PM:

" Much more serious than the plagiarism is the university's refusal to release the contracts of its top officials to the press and to the public. This is disgraceful. Contracts of public officials have always been public (even before the Freedom of Information Act.) "

Wayne wrote on Sep 16, 2006 12:23 PM:

" Those attack dogs who are hounding SIU about plagiarism are a bunch of vendictive old coots who are not really interested in plagiarism, but in getting even. I'll take plagirairsm over revenge any day. Since when does any one pay attention to some self appointed god squad anyway. I say ignore them! "

Blueberry wrote on Sep 16, 2006 10:32 AM:

" I think enrolment problems are more relevant than cans of Raid. No, you moved the discussion to talking about motives of those who attack Wendler. I'm just following you. Putting it another way, this is supposed to be commenting on a story. The story contained the words "'Sometimes there are just exemplary documents out there that institutions would be flattered to know were adopted to serve a purpose at another institution,' Dodd said. 'I think what was unusual here is the fact elements were copied verbatim from one plan or without the creativity of rewriting and making it clearly pertinent to SIU the elements of that strategic plan.'" Dodd is questioning the relevance of the document to SIUC. I'm agreeing. Gus, before you leap in, READ THE STORY. "

PiningForYou wrote on Sep 15, 2006 11:40 AM:

" C'mon Joan, please speak to us. We are pining for your considerable insight. Please tell us that this about ethics and not just a cheap publicity-generating political stunt. "

Saluki grad wrote on Sep 15, 2006 10:10 AM:

" I agree with a Duke ethics professor who said in a recent story (and I paraphrase) that (apparently) using large summary sections of the TX A&M document with little modification was uncreative but not plagarism (end of paraphrase). Portions of Dr. Wendler's plan could have been tailored more to SIU and all of this would have been avoided. However, the people that are pursuing this thing are malcontents conducting a virtual witchhunt. It is sad to see a small group do so much unnecessary PR damage to my alma mater. Note that I've attributed remarks and appropriately noted that they are not verbatum lest I fall victim to the witchhunters! "

Gus Maroscher wrote on Sep 15, 2006 9:14 AM:

" Dear Blueberry: I thought this discussion was about “Plagiarism Watchdogs." Now you write “SIU's number 1 problem is enrollment." Am I missing something...did the blueberry patch get sprayed with a bit of Roundup? "

Please-NoWhiners wrote on Sep 14, 2006 3:38 PM:

" I agree with 'SIU Grad' when he writes "It's sour grapes." May I also suggest that "these grapes of wrath" are fermenting a most indelicate whine. "

cvbrown wrote on Sep 14, 2006 3:34 PM:

" I don't see where the problem is here. If Chancellor Wendler used the same ideas that he incorporated into the plan at College Station so what! He was a part of the process down there and he shouldn't have to leave it behind because he took a new job. If he thought of that stuff it is his to use as far as I'm concerned. Seems to me everybody is pointing the finger at everyone but themselves. This watchdog group that is in place as a result of the firing of one professor should look at what he did wrong. With every action there are consequences. Man up and deal with them! "

Blueberry wrote on Sep 14, 2006 3:25 PM:

" Samuels and Maroscher both miss the point. If Wendler were doing his job, the University would be better off. SIU's number 1 problem is enrolment, with falling student quality second. These are not Texas A&M's problems. The two Universities are very different. Wendler not only copied from his earlier work (or other people's), it wasn't even relevant work. "

Fahrvergnuegen wrote on Sep 14, 2006 3:11 PM:

" Speak to Joan...in any language. English, Spanish, Petaese, we will understand you. "

CapLamp wrote on Sep 12, 2006 7:06 PM:

" Mark Samuels asked "If Walter Wendler 'authored' both the Texas A&M and SIU long-range development plan, how can he plagiarize himself?" Answer: The same way Wendler's enemies are now performing acts of intellectual self-gratification. "

Ad Nauseam wrote on Sep 12, 2006 3:56 PM:

" Joan of Ark was 'mobbed.' In this case a Joan of a different kind is leading the mob. "

Gus Maroscher wrote on Sep 12, 2006 3:21 PM:

" Mark, my man, as usual, even from many miles away--you called this one correctly. The Lilliputians are on another rampage. Quick, someone get a can of RAID! "

copywrite wrote on Sep 12, 2006 2:46 PM:

" The issue at hand is not really plagerism, but an issue of copyrite. If Wendler was indeed the author of the plan at Texas, then he should have asked for permission to use the same concepts for the SIUC plan, cited the source and gave credit where credit is due, then this would have all been avoided. Now SIUC is in a Public Realtions mess....and is reacting to these issues instead of being proactive in avoiding the problems. "

Mark Samuels wrote on Sep 12, 2006 10:31 AM:

" If Walter Wendler "authored" both the Texas A&M and SIU long-range development plan, how can he plagiarize himself? I suspect Professor Friedenberg and others are targeting Dr. Wendler more for his outspoken faith-based leadership than this microscopic tempest in a teapot. I urge President Poshard to stand behind his leadership team in this instance or soon the inmates will be running the asylum. "

SIUC Alum wrote on Sep 12, 2006 9:35 AM:

" Fairness? This is a personal vendetta! It's sour grapes. Are we to believe there is a demon behind every SIUC document as these self-appointed plagiarism police seem to propagate? These people are no friends of SIUC and their interests are self-centered and warped. The programs of institutions are often similar in nature. These are not copyright protected in most cases and leniency is most often granted toward adaptations. Let's get off the case of the SIU administrators before there is a full-scale backlash that tears our university apart! "

Out now wrote on Sep 12, 2006 9:12 AM:

" You say "Wendler authored both the SIUC and Texas A&M plans", but it appears he was only the coordinator. So he has stolen this work twice: once, when looking for a job at SIU, and he claimed to have written the document; the second time, when he rewrote it. "

TheWonderer wrote on Sep 12, 2006 6:56 AM:

" ...panel members are Paul Simon Public Policy Director Mike Lawrence, SIUC zoology department chair William Muhlach and SIU law school associate dean Wenona Whitfield. Is that the same Mike Lawrence who at one time contributed to THE SOUTHER--and that the university eventually muzzled? "